Comments on: NSFW – Janet Jackson Superbowl Nipple

By: bluebec

bluebec — Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:40:21 +0000

Her nipple jewellery is SO big that it obscures anything remotely “rude”.

This was such a non-event when it was screened in Australia as a story about how prudish you Yanks are. No-one cared about Janet’s breast, but we all laughed at the prudishness.

By: ack

ack — Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:03:55 +0000

I’m not impressed.

Now if it would have been a tear away skirt and c-ring the size of a door knocker…

By: Bsinger1017

Bsinger1017 — Mon, 25 Feb 2008 07:58:35 +0000

I’ve seen better tits in National Geographic magazine…

By: reptilecobra13

reptilecobra13 — Mon, 25 Feb 2008 02:47:15 +0000

“Bitty!”

By: casemods

casemods — Mon, 25 Feb 2008 00:44:06 +0000

Justin: “Cmon’ titty, cmon’ titty!”

By: AlecDalek

AlecDalek — Sun, 24 Feb 2008 22:50:48 +0000

It’s the fucking human body. What the fuck is obscene about boobs? Babies look at them all the time. There are just so many dumb fucks in the world that want to live in fantasy land where people aren’t allowed to be human!

By: Caio

Caio — Sun, 24 Feb 2008 22:18:53 +0000

Because, RSI, it was being broadcast to places like Utah those weird evangelist towns that have been popping up where bars are considered the equivalent of brothels.

By: Gilez

Gilez — Sun, 24 Feb 2008 18:01:54 +0000

GAWDDAM!!!! that tit should NOT have been aired in any way shape or form. Its a 40 year old tit on a not attractive jackson! JESUS!

By: numb7rs

numb7rs — Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:47:58 +0000

Is it just me or does she bear a striking resemblance to her brother here? Minus the tits of course.

By: RSIxidor

RSIxidor — Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:35:03 +0000

Seriously, if this was at a bar, it would be considered non-nude, why should the super bowl be any different?

By: w0x

w0x — Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:24:28 +0000

This is incredibly old.

But the question still remains.
WHAT THE FUCK IS ON HER BEWB?