Standard Disclaimer: Unless specifically mentioned in the post, we have no clue where this picture came from. Know where it came from? Post the link in the comments, and reap the glory that is knowledge. All comments are the sole possesion of the commenters and do not reflect the opinions or values of MCS.
tits or GTFO. she’s still wearing a top.
she’s wearing a top, and seemingly nothing else… when did that become the criteria for topless?
ytsejam6922 we dont tolerate that sort of thing here.
@Snow
who you trying to kid?
@Snow:
read: it would be nice if we didn’t tolerate that stuff around here. . . sadly our captain is drunk, and forgets his keelhauling responsibilities
Now don’t quote me on this but I think this came from Playboy back in the day. I know I’ve seen this somewhere before and, originally, it wasn’t on the internets.
Admittingly, she DID have a nice rack!
I dunno. kind of a butterface, but a nice cut of her body. Are we comparing her to the girl next door or girls in FHM? If I were single, I’d do her, but not necessarily call her the next day. What level of HAWTness are we working on here?
@WistfulD:
You sir are either 14 or retarded.
That there is Daisy Duke.
Seriously, though, someone needs to get out a dictionary and look up “topless”, because one seems rather plainly present here. Wet T-Shirt is nice, but it does not qualify as “topless”. :p
Damn kids these days have no idea what hot was in the 70s and 80s.
Oh yeah, before I forget…
VAGINAS ARE SUPPOSED TO HAVE HAIR
NO…GRANNY PORN IS NOT COOL
not topless