Standard Disclaimer: Unless specifically mentioned in the post, we have no clue where this picture came from. Know where it came from? Post the link in the comments, and reap the glory that is knowledge. All comments are the sole possesion of the commenters and do not reflect the opinions or values of MCS.
It’s the wrong kind of Mermaid. Originaly Mermaids had 2 fish legs (so they could have genital between them). It’s only been in the last half a century that uptight folks have made it so that Mermaids only have one fish leg. Heck, the original Starbucks logo showed she had 2 fish legs (pulled up on either side of her). Over time they cropped them out. Fucking prudes!
“Real Mermaid.” Sounds dubious.
no thanks. one time i saw a girl with webbed toes and that was gross, i can’t image dealing with this.
The flesh tone tail just does not bide well with me. Course if she flips over and has a human ass, I’d hit it!
The tail looks like a sausage.
She appears to be human down to the knees. Which is a good indication of having human lady-parts.
@reboot:
she might be human all the way down to the feet and just have huge fins on her ankles. would be the best of both worlds I think
Gonna fuck her, gonna fuck her fishy tushy all nite long, na na na na naaaaa….
I can’t tell if her legs open!
It’s the wrong kind of Mermaid. Originaly Mermaids had 2 fish legs (so they could have genital between them). It’s only been in the last half a century that uptight folks have made it so that Mermaids only have one fish leg. Heck, the original Starbucks logo showed she had 2 fish legs (pulled up on either side of her). Over time they cropped them out. Fucking prudes!