Comments on: Real Mermaid – NSFW

By: AlecDalek

AlecDalek — Sat, 22 Nov 2008 14:36:01 +0000

It’s the wrong kind of Mermaid. Originaly Mermaids had 2 fish legs (so they could have genital between them). It’s only been in the last half a century that uptight folks have made it so that Mermaids only have one fish leg. Heck, the original Starbucks logo showed she had 2 fish legs (pulled up on either side of her). Over time they cropped them out. Fucking prudes!

By: casemods

casemods — Sat, 22 Nov 2008 09:25:13 +0000

I can’t tell if her legs open!

By: garbledxmission

garbledxmission — Sat, 22 Nov 2008 06:03:03 +0000

Gonna fuck her, gonna fuck her fishy tushy all nite long, na na na na naaaaa….

By: tiki god

tiki god — Sat, 22 Nov 2008 02:54:52 +0000

@reboot: she might be human all the way down to the feet and just have huge fins on her ankles. would be the best of both worlds I think

By: reboot

reboot — Sat, 22 Nov 2008 01:18:00 +0000

She appears to be human down to the knees. Which is a good indication of having human lady-parts.

By: dieAntagonista

dieAntagonista — Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:41:40 +0000

The tail looks like a sausage.

By: Recondomoe

Recondomoe — Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:07:24 +0000

The flesh tone tail just does not bide well with me. Course if she flips over and has a human ass, I’d hit it!

By: thatonejimguy

thatonejimguy — Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:07:03 +0000

no thanks. one time i saw a girl with webbed toes and that was gross, i can’t image dealing with this.

By: MacheteJak

MacheteJak — Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:03:42 +0000

“Real Mermaid.” Sounds dubious.