Your Ad Here
Advertisement
Your Ad Here
Advertisement
Your Ad Here
Advertisement

Advertisement
Your Ad Here
RSS Feeds
MCS Posts:

Comments:

MCS - NSFW

More information on the MCS RSS feeds

nsfw – Objects of Desire - February 23, 2009 by amir.t | Images, NSFW

Tags: , , ...

objects_of_desire_530.jpg (43 KB)

This is an advertisment
Related Posts
  • Firefly – Objects In Space
  • objects in mirror are closer than they appear – hope
  • seeing faces on inanimate objects is not normal – but on meth it is
  • Rigger
  • Envy
  • John Paul II’s Secret Desire
  • Dream Controlling Cat
  • Tiki is on twitter
  • Sap Refraction
  • Solid Objects

  • Share This Post:

    17 Comments - “nsfw – Objects of Desire”

    Standard Disclaimer: Unless specifically mentioned in the post, we have no clue where this picture came from. Know where it came from? Post the link in the comments, and reap the glory that is knowledge. All comments are the sole possesion of the commenters and do not reflect the opinions or values of MCS.

    17 Responses to “nsfw – Objects of Desire”

    1. Vote -1 Vote +1Bark (UID#7097)

      Desire? I prefer the real thing

    2. Vote -1 Vote +1Gilly (UID#734)

      Ha ha. I got it. Has to be a joke.

    3. Vote -1 Vote +1zilch (UID#3420)

      NSFW? i dont see anything NSFW

    4. Vote -1 Vote +1WistfulD (UID#5057)

      @zilch:

      Yeah, because you work at ImaginaryPlaceOfWork, where if it doesn’t show nipples or genitals, it’s okay. The rest of us work in the real world, where (if they check out what we are doing online at all) they will object to stuff like this, since it would make them look highly unprofessional if your coworker brought a client into the office while you were looking at this, or the fact that a jumpy coworker could have a problem with seeing this on your monitor, and threaten to file a sexually harrassing atmosphere claim against them.

      Seriously, live in the real world.

    5. Vote -1 Vote +1reboot (UID#436)

      @WistfulD: In your “real world”, there has never been a SFW post on mcs, ever.

    6. Vote -1 Vote +1Wip8outUK (UID#7690)

      Stop whining.

    7. Vote -1 Vote +1Mack (UID#1642)

      Dolls of cliche people. Urgh.

    8. Vote -1 Vote +1RSIxidor (UID#950)

      Why is the man articulated more than the woman? She better have that bendy plastic.

      @reboot:
      I think you might be right-ish.

    9. Vote -1 Vote +1Annarchy (UID#2805)

      How are either of them desirable? They don’t have genitals!

    10. Vote -1 Vote +1Siiderihai (UID#2618)

      “And suddenly Barbie and Ken realized sex would be a problem”

    11. Vote -1 Vote +1Paul_Is_Drunk (UID#796)

      I’m not particularly fond of the dim-looking blond with stripper heels, but do any of the women find UFC here attractive?

    12. Vote -1 Vote +1CathyLong (UID#4881)

      Yeah neither of them look appealing. But the good news is, generics like that tend to stick with one another.

    13. Vote -1 Vote +1Annarchy (UID#2805)

      Wait, there is a good thing about these two: they can never breed!

    14. Vote -1 Vote +1wookie_x (UID#962)

      @CathyLong: I initially read your post as “genetics like that tend to stick with one another.” Genetics or generics, either one works!

    15. Vote -1 Vote +1nyokki (UID#3444)

      @Paul_Is_Drunk: Nope, not finding UFC attractive at all.

    16. Vote -1 Vote +1Dyna-Mole (UID#3992)

      She’d be way hotter with a penis

    17. Vote -1 Vote +1nyokki (UID#3444)

      @Dyna-Mole: Lol. Both of them?

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.