Sexy Amputees
NSFW images on February 20th, 2010 by TheLotusEater725 | Report This Post | 
Add to favorites | Tags: Amputees, WTF
publish in 

Leave A Comment
Leave a comment ?
21 Responses to Sexy Amputees
Reply to Maxwell Edison ¬
Cancel reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
February 2, 2010 at 8:59 am
this is disturbingly hot.
February 20, 2010 at 8:07 pm
Why is it disturbing? Outside of models and other hot-by-nature women, these are attractive individuals, who happen to have had a major medical incident where they lost a limb. Some medical injuries leave someone downright ugly and we all know that. Take off part of someone’s face and they look ugly. What has happened to these women did not make them ugly. It hindered their lives, but they are still pretty. Why is that disturbing?
February 2, 2010 at 5:03 pm
Someone else wipes #2’s ass. Think about it.
February 20, 2010 at 7:56 pm
Yeah, I downvoted myself on that one.
February 20, 2010 at 8:03 pm
or she has her hands in her pockets.
February 20, 2010 at 9:58 pm
you’re wrong, but i up-voted you cuz i lol’d
February 22, 2010 at 5:55 pm
She might, but if so, it’s because she had no other way of carrying them around after they were cut off.
February 18, 2010 at 6:48 pm
Peggy and Eileen approve.
February 20, 2010 at 6:33 pm
Oooooooooooold one. Still good for a lulz tho.
February 20, 2010 at 7:46 pm
Do not want
February 20, 2010 at 10:32 pm
i wonder how the one lost her hands and legs
February 21, 2010 at 1:18 am
She lost a fight on the internet.
February 21, 2010 at 6:35 pm
There is a fetish that really creeps me out, it consists a small subset of people who willingly have perfectly good limbs removed; some to the point of only being a torso. Being that #2’s amputations are uniformly at the joints, she may very well be one of that group.
What will they do when they awaken one day and scream “What the did I do to myself!” It’d be very difficult to suicide out when you’re just a torso. *shiver*
February 21, 2010 at 8:12 pm
#2’s amputations are not uniformly at the joints. At which point is middle forearm a joint? It looks like she’s had her lower legs amputated at the knees, but if you know anything about amputation, they try and preserve as much of the joint as possible because it makes prosthesises far easier to attach and move around in, because you can still bend your knees.
What ever happened to #2 (and don’t forget people, these women are still all human), was very severe to have that much of her body removed.
February 22, 2010 at 4:40 am
I originally thought that it was visual foreshortening that made the arm look shorter, at second look I was mistaken. It was callous of me to, not knowing her, associate her with the condition nyokki described.
I agree, just because the hardware is damaged, does not mean the operating system is; all of us are just an accident away from confirming that for ourselves. I very much respect the person in photo #2, I’d very likely give up.
February 21, 2010 at 10:28 pm
It’s not a fetish; it’s a problem in the brain. Everyone has a idea in their head about where their body is. People who amputate perfectly good limbs have a distorted idea about what their body is. Imagine trying to drag around a leg that is 12″ longer than you think it is. It literally drives them crazy. Most of them are fine once they’ve amputated whatever part of their body is not supposed to be there.
I suppose there are some out there w/ a fetish for amputees, but I doubt many of them want parts of their body amputated.
February 22, 2010 at 4:25 am
Thank You for correcting me nyokki, what the person is feeling is no more a fetish than anorexia is. Fetish was a very poor choice of words.
I was very tired when I posted, and did not think it through.
I mistakenly used the word fetish thinking of a guy, who I knew in college, who had a thing for amputeeism, rather than the person in the body.
Also, I was allowing my powerful aversion to anything that limits the motion of my limbs to combine with my tendency to mentally place myself others physical situations. I then commented more on how I’d feel only being a torso (which led to the closing statement in my previous post), rather than considering the persons mental and emotional state.
I do so much better on this site when I keep my mouth shut.
February 22, 2010 at 4:33 pm
No worries. It is really weird though. I watched a show (NOVA or something on PBS, I think) that had a segment on it about people who purposefully amputate a part of their body, because it simply wasn’t supposed to be there. Could you imagine it? The one guy put his leg (below the knee) into liquid nitrogen, forcing doctors to amputate. Now he has a prosthetic and is a happy man. The brain is a strange thing.
February 26, 2010 at 2:02 pm
I found the story of the gu I was talking about, #3.
www.oddee.com/item_96982.aspx
February 20, 2010 at 9:43 pm
Tony Soprano did it, so why can’t we?
February 20, 2010 at 10:14 pm
Number 1 I’d hit.
Quadruple amputee, I’m afraid, until they regain self-sufficiency by some postmodern technological magic, is not attractive to me.
Number 3 is ugly, leg on or off.