Real Mermaid – NSFW

w.jpg (35 KB)


Send to Facebook | Send To Twitter
  • JuicyAds

  • Leave A Comment

    Please Login to comment
    9 Comment threads
    0 Thread replies
    0 Followers
     
    Most reacted comment
    Hottest comment thread
    9 Comment authors
    AlecDalekcasemodsgarbledxmissiontiki godreboot Recent comment authors
      Subscribe  
    Notify of
    MacheteJak
    Guest

    “Real Mermaid.” Sounds dubious.

    Deleted_User
    Guest

    no thanks. one time i saw a girl with webbed toes and that was gross, i can’t image dealing with this.

    Recondomoe
    Guest

    The flesh tone tail just does not bide well with me. Course if she flips over and has a human ass, I’d hit it!

    dieAntagonista
    Guest
    dieAntagonista

    The tail looks like a sausage.

    The Matrix: Rebooted
    Guest
    The Matrix: Rebooted

    She appears to be human down to the knees. Which is a good indication of having human lady-parts.

    tiki god
    Admin

    @reboot:
    she might be human all the way down to the feet and just have huge fins on her ankles. would be the best of both worlds I think

    garbledxmission
    Guest
    garbledxmission

    Gonna fuck her, gonna fuck her fishy tushy all nite long, na na na na naaaaa….

    deleted_user
    Guest

    I can’t tell if her legs open!

    Alec Dalek
    Guest

    It’s the wrong kind of Mermaid. Originaly Mermaids had 2 fish legs (so they could have genital between them). It’s only been in the last half a century that uptight folks have made it so that Mermaids only have one fish leg. Heck, the original Starbucks logo showed she had 2 fish legs (pulled up on either side of her). Over time they cropped them out. Fucking prudes!